Twenty-five students (20 High School and 5 Middle School) participated in a survey that asked them to provide their preference between Flexi and Khanmigo responses.
The purpose of this study is to compare student attitudes and perceptions of the quality of Flexi responses to Khanmigo's responses.
The students took a survey that displayed the Flexi answer and the Khanmigo answer to 12 questions (6 math and 6 science). The questions were randomly positioned as option 1 or option 2 with no identifying characteristics that would indicate which answer came from Flexi and which answer came from Khanmigo. Questions were chosen to reflect as many avenues for analysis as possible. Categories considered were field, imagery, process, and complexity.